WRENFORDACADEMIC

Publishing standards · Version 1.0 · 30 August 2026

Transparent policies.
Accountable publishing.

This framework sets the minimum standards for journals published by Wrenford Academic. It is designed around recognised expectations for open access, editorial quality, research integrity and international discoverability.

Important status statement

Standards alignment is not indexation.

DOAJ and Scopus assess journals individually. Publication of this framework does not mean that Wrenford Academic or any future journal has been accepted, indexed, certified or endorsed by either service.

Before submissions open, each journal must publish complete title-specific information and demonstrate that its stated procedures operate in practice.

01 · Identity & ownership

Clear about who publishes the work.

Wrenford Publishing Limited trades as Wrenford Academic in the United Kingdom. Editorial decisions are made independently from commercial, sponsorship and partnership interests. Each journal page will identify its owner, publisher, editor, editorial office, dedicated contact and full registered mailing address.

Required before launch

The registered office, Companies House number and operational journal contacts must be verified and displayed before manuscript submission opens.

02 · Open access, copyright & licensing

Immediate access with explicit reuse rights.

Wrenford's open-access journals make scholarly articles freely available immediately on publication, without registration, subscription or embargo. Open-access research will not be mixed with subscription-only research in the same title.

  • Authors retain copyright unless a journal clearly discloses a different arrangement.
  • The default licence is Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0); any title-level alternative must be stated before submission.
  • The copyright holder and licence link must appear on every HTML and PDF article.
  • Authors may deposit the submitted manuscript, accepted manuscript and Version of Record in a repository without embargo, subject to the article licence.
  • Third-party material with different rights must be clearly credited and labelled.

03 · Peer review & editorial decisions

Independent assessment, editor-led decisions.

Research and review articles are evaluated by qualified experts who are independent of the journal's editorial team. Each journal publishes its review model, identity-masking arrangements and any non-reviewed article types.

  1. Editorial screening. Scope, originality, ethics, reporting and basic methodological suitability are checked.
  2. Independent review. Normally at least two independent subject experts review research articles; conflicts are screened before invitation.
  3. Author revision. Authors receive consolidated comments and respond point by point.
  4. Decision. The handling editor weighs the evidence and recommendations; reviewers do not make the final decision.
  5. Record. Submission, acceptance and publication dates appear with the Version of Record.

Acceptance is never guaranteed. Editors, board members and guest editors who submit work receive an independent process with no involvement in the decision. Supplementary materials and review exceptions are identified on the article.

04 · Publication ethics & research integrity

Procedures for the difficult cases.

Authorship & contribution

Authors must meet the journal's authorship criteria and take responsibility for the work. Contributor roles, acknowledgements and changes to authorship must be transparent.

Competing interests

Authors, reviewers and editors disclose financial, personal, institutional and intellectual interests. Editors with a conflict do not handle the manuscript.

Misconduct

Plagiarism, fabrication, falsification, image manipulation, citation manipulation, duplicate publication and paper-mill activity are investigated without regard to status or affiliation.

Ethical oversight

Research involving people, animals, personal data or vulnerable communities must report appropriate approval, consent and welfare safeguards.

Data & reproducibility

Authors provide a data-availability statement and share data, code and protocols where ethically and legally possible. Restrictions must be explained.

Corrections & retractions

The record may be corrected, retracted or updated through a linked, dated and clearly labelled notice. The original record remains identifiable.

Complaints and appeals

Authors and readers may raise a confidential concern through the journal's dedicated editorial contact. Appeals must identify the decision, grounds and supporting evidence. A senior editor who was not responsible for the original decision reviews the case. Complaints about an editor are escalated to the publisher or an independent member of the journal's governing body. Outcomes are provided in writing and do not guarantee reversal of an editorial decision.

05 · Artificial intelligence & automated tools

Disclosed use, human responsibility.

  • Authors disclose generative-AI use beyond routine spelling, grammar, formatting or language editing.
  • AI tools cannot qualify as authors or be cited as the authoritative source of a claim.
  • Authors remain accountable for accuracy, originality, attribution, permissions and the integrity of all submitted content.
  • Reviewers and editors must not upload confidential manuscripts to generative-AI services or use them to create assessments.
  • Any routine publisher use of automated tools is disclosed, tested and subject to human verification; automated integrity flags never determine an outcome alone.

06 · Editorial governance, diversity & independence

Scholarship governs scholarship.

Every journal has a named editor and a subject-qualified advisory or editorial board of at least five appropriately qualified editors who are not all from the same institution. Names, roles and institutional affiliations are kept current, members consent to serve, and the board is reviewed regularly. Recruitment seeks broad disciplinary, institutional and geographical representation among editors, reviewers and authors. Decisions are based on scholarly merit and are not affected by nationality, ethnicity, political belief, race, religion, gender, disability, institutional prestige or ability to pay.

Editorial endogeny is monitored: articles with an editor, board member or reviewer as an author must not exceed 25% of research content in either of the latest two issues, or in the latest calendar year for continuous publication.

07 · Author fees, waivers, revenue & advertising

No hidden charges. No commercial influence.

Before submission, each journal states every possible submission, processing, publication, page, colour, language-editing, membership and withdrawal charge. A journal with no author charges states this explicitly. Where waivers apply, the eligibility rules, amount, responsible author, timing and application route are disclosed. Fee or waiver status is not visible to reviewers and does not influence editorial decisions.

Revenue sources—including author fees, services, sponsorship, subsidies, reprints, conferences or special issues—are disclosed at journal level and are separated from editorial decision making. Wrenford journals do not carry intrusive advertising; any future advertising policy will identify permitted categories, decision responsibility and separation from editorial content. Any manuscript invitation or direct marketing must be accurate, appropriately targeted, unobtrusive and easy to decline.

08 · Scholarly record, metadata & preservation

Discoverable now. Preserved for the future.

  • Each article has a unique landing page and downloadable full text, normally in HTML and PDF.
  • Articles display title, authors, affiliations, abstract, keywords, references, licence, copyright holder and submission/acceptance/publication dates.
  • Persistent identifiers, normally DOIs, are registered and maintained; author identifiers and funder metadata are supported where available.
  • Metadata is supplied regularly to relevant registries and discovery services and is updated after corrections or retractions.
  • Each journal names its independent long-term preservation arrangement before launch, using a recognised archive listed in the Keepers Registry or an equivalent service.

09 · Publishing schedule & special issues

Regularity without shortcuts.

Each journal declares and maintains a realistic publishing schedule. Special issues remain within scope and under the Editor-in-Chief's authority, follow the same external-review and ethics standards as regular content, and are clearly labelled. Guest editors are vetted, supervised and recused from decisions on their own work. Guest-editor submissions receive an independent process and make up no more than 25% of the special issue. Unexplained changes in article volume, authorship geography or citation behaviour are reviewed as potential integrity signals.

10 · Journal-level transparency checklist

What every title must publish before submissions open.

Operational evidence is also required

A website alone is not sufficient. A DOAJ applicant must be actively publishing scholarly research, normally at least five research articles per year; a new journal must have more than one year of publishing history or at least ten open-access research articles. Scopus also requires a reviewable publication history, regularity, international readability, academic contribution and credible journal and editor standing.

01

Unique journal title, dedicated URL, aims and scope, target readership and accepted article types

02

Confirmed print and/or electronic ISSN exactly matching the ISSN Register

03

Editor and editorial board names, roles, institutional affiliations and current consent to serve

04

Publication frequency, publication history and evidence that the announced schedule is maintained

05

Peer-review model, reviewer independence, decision process, exceptions and special-issue oversight

06

Open-access statement, article licence, copyright holder and repository/self-archiving rights

07

Every author charge, waiver condition and withdrawal charge—or an explicit statement that no fees apply

08

Publisher legal name, registered address, journal contact person and dedicated editorial email

09

Digital preservation service, persistent identifiers, metadata deposits and article-level publication dates

10

English titles, abstracts and keywords, with full text and references presented for an international readership

Official standards consulted

This policy framework was prepared with reference to the DOAJ Guide to applying, Principles of Transparency and Best Practice in Scholarly Publishing and the Scopus content policy and selection criteria. These organisations do not approve publisher policy templates in advance.